Scott Wadding

Managing Partner

image description

Scott is the Managing Partner of Sease & Wadding whose trial and appellate practice focuses on helping people and businesses win inside and outside the courtroom.  Scott’s cases  include business disputes, constitutional litigation, intellectual property, professional liability, and personal injury.

Scott is results driven and has significant experience wrestling with complex and novel trial and appellate issues.  He has an inside perspective of the appellate process, which has proven critical to developing successful legal strategies in state and federal trial and appellate courts.

Scott has successfully represented people and companies in cases of all sizes and degrees of complexity, including successfully trying several jury and bench trials to verdict, obtaining an outright dismissal for a homeless man against a predatory lender, developing successful legal strategies to exclude key expert witness testimony in a nine-figure intellectual property case, crafting and implementing winning trial strategies for damages in high-stakes and bet-the-company intellectual property and business tort cases.

Notable Cases

Herbst v. Sioux County et al. (successful resolution in a wrongful death action arising from alleged unconstitutional and negligent conduct of county officials)

Schiebout v. Sioux County et al. (successful resolution in a wrongful death action arising from alleged unconstitutional and negligent conduct of county officials)

John Doe v. Jasper County (successful resolution for injuries arising from unconstitutional jail conditions)

John Doe v. Archdiocese of Dubuque (successful resolution for injuries arising from alleged child sex abuse committed by a priest in the 1970s)

Sprint v. Cox (D. Del.) (representation of telecommunications company in crafting and implementing damages case in nine-figure patent infringement litigation involving groundbreaking telecommunications technology)

Sprint v. Comcast (D. Kan. 2018) (representation of telecommunications company in crafting and implementing damages case in nine-figure patent infringement litigation involving groundbreaking telecommunications technology)

Bagbey v. DePhillips et al. (representation of home purchaser in fraud and misrepresentation litigation)

Smith et al. v. Godwin Realty et al. (representation of homeowners who lost proceeds from the sale of their home as a result of wire fraud during a real estate closing)

Sprint v. Time Warner Cable (D. Kan.) (representation of telecommunications company in crafting and implementing damages case in nine-figure patent infringement litigation involving groundbreaking telecommunications technology)

M.L. v. Immanuel Lutheran Church (representation of victim of child abuse and fraud committed by child care center)

Vergara v. California (Cal.) (preparation of amicus brief in appellate litigation before the California Supreme Court on behalf of constitutional law scholars in landmark education litigation)

StrikeForce Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation (D. Del.) (representation of technology company in patent infringement litigation involving two-factor authentication technology)

Oracle USA v. Rimini Street, Inc. (D. Nev.) (representation of third-party maintenance provider in implementing winning damages case at trial in software copyright and business tort dispute)